Yet Wein and Berkowitz ultimately don’t shy away from this aspect of his life, delving somewhat graphically into his memories of sadomasochistic eroticism, a decision that not only helps the film from being another PBS-friendly look back at AIDS but also an unabashed and even transgressive portrait of sexuality. Going beyond Berkowitz (but always gravitating back to him), Wein paints a vivid picture of the landscape of urban sexual experimentation in late Seventies and early Eighties Manhattan, gradually and richly weaving in the stories of the aforementioned Kramer (who’s framed as something of a nemesis to Berkowitz, as their evident continued antipathy towards each other demonstrates), Dr. Joseph Sonnabend (a research scientist whose controversial, now largely refuted, theories about AIDS being transmitted not from a single agent but from a combination of multiple exposures greatly influenced Berkowitz’s viewpoint), and the now-deceased Michael Callen, who tirelessly worked alongside Berkowitz to promote safe-sex awareness. Filling out Wein’s tapestry are archival interviews of Berkowitz and Kramer arguing on CNN in 1982 and old sound bites of right-wing hysteria from the nightly news, including everyone’s favorite 2008 election pundit, Pat Buchanan, claiming that it’s the “height of irresponsibility” for the gay community to ask for government funding for AIDS research, as it’s their “fault” in the first place.![]() Of course not all of the found footage is equally revelatory—witness the copious amounts of standard, grainy “Gay Sex in the 70s” B-roll, with images of shirtless, supposedly hedonistic men in short-shorts set to the rhythms of “Mama Told Me Not to Come”—and not all of the talking heads on display are given their fair visual shakes (another former hustler and associate of Berkowitz’s is framed in the most grotesque manner possible, supine with his belly hanging out over sloppy shorts; meanwhile, Mama Berkowitz gets a frumpy outdoor medium shot that makes her often delightfully addled remarks seem overly buffoonish). But these are minor complaints about a sophisticated work of nonfiction that does its very standard format proud. Apart from its subject’s continued urgency (as of 2007, the film states, one in four gay men in New York have HIV, and the fastest growing infected group is males between ages 13 and 19), “Sex Positive” is bracing in its honesty: towards the end of the film, a handful of the film’s interviewees admit to never having heard of Richard Berkowitz. It’s information that Wein could have left on the cutting-room floor, as it somewhat undermines his subject’s stature. Instead, it adds a new spin to all we’ve seen before, and it’s further proof that the greatly unknown history of safe sex is one that needs excavating. <<---Back |
Safety First: Daryl Wein’s “Sex Positive”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
delving somewhat graphically into his memories of sadomasochistic eroticism, a decision that not only helps the film from being another PBS-friendly look back at AIDS but also an unabashed and even transgressive portrait of sexuality. Going beyond Berkowitz (but always gravitating back to him), Wein paints a vivid picture of the landscape of urban sexual experimentation in late Seventies and early Eighties Manhattan, gradually and richly weaving in the stories of the aforementioned Kramer (who’s framed as something of a nemesis to Berkowitz, as their evident continued antipathy towards each other demonstrates), Dr. Joseph Sonnabend (a research scientist whose controversial, now largely refuted, theories about AIDS being transmitted not from a single agent but from a combination of multiple exposures greatly influenced Berkowitz’s viewpoint), and the now-deceased Michael Callen, who tirelessly worked alongside Berkowitz to promote safe-sex awareness. Filling out Wein’s tapestry are archival interviews of Berkowitz and Kramer arguing on CNN in 1982 and old sound bites of right-wing hysteria from the nightly news, including everyone’s favorite 2008 election pundit, Pat Buchanan, claiming that it’s the “height of irresponsibility” for the gay community to ask for government funding for AIDS research, as it’s their “fault” in the first place.


0 comments:
Post a Comment